Accessible ramp dimensions

Comments

6 comments

  • Avatar
    Christian Strom

    Hi Michael,

    A question about cross slopes just came up in a practice exam I was taking. ADA 405.3 states "Cross slope of ramp runs shall not be steeper than 1:48." My local code is slightly stricter and requires a max 1:50 cross slope. Effectively, these are both 2%, but if asked on the exams about ADA requirements, I believe 1:48 would be the correct answer. Just wanted to point this out and ask if I'm missing something. Thanks.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    mermann

    Sloping concrete is nowhere near that precise, so the difference between 1:50 and 1:48 is like measuring the distance between New York and LA in INCHES and getting two different (but close) numbers. They are effectively the same thing (but can be found written as 2%, 1:50, or 1:48 in various publications).

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Kirill Aleksandrov

    Information provided here isn't quite accurate - there is no length requirement from I can see (only height), landings at the bottom are longer than intermediate/top landings, and the cross-slope is called out in the code as 1:48, unless local folks require a flatter slope.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    bowermb

    If I understand your comment about there being no mention of length requirements, Michael is simply relating that max slope of 1:12 to the max rise of 30", which equates to a max length of 30'. At 1:12, every 1" in rise requires 1' of run.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Kirill Aleksandrov

    That's exactly my point - it is important to read how the code is written - the limiting requirement by code is 30-in height - if the slope of the ramp were less steep (say between 5 and 8%), you would get a longer run, therefore, 30-ft is not a maximum length requirement - it is only true when calculated as max slope and max height, so calling out 30-ft max length for a ramp is misleading, because it only applies to one case... and it actually represents minimum length.

    That's of course unless I missed a provision that does have actual max length restriction somewhere... in that case I take everything back.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    bowermb

    I think that was the assumption, based on his comment. Maximum and minimum are relative to what you're referring to. It's the max uninterrupted length when designed at 1:12. And for the purpose of the ARE, understanding those limits are what's critical - which I believe was his point. I'll let him chime in if he meant something different by it though.

    Regardless, it's important to make that distinction. I understand what you mean.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk