PCM questions ?

Comments

2 comments

  • Avatar
    LeventK

    Great question — and it's one that often causes confusion because Multiple Prime Contractors is not typically categorized as a standalone project delivery method like Design-Bid-Build (DBB), CM-at-Risk, or Design-Build. Instead, it's best understood as a variation of the traditional DBB or CM approach in how contracts are structured and managed.

    It is a contractual strategy or procurement variation, not a formal project delivery method on its own.

    In a Multiple Prime Contracting approach:

    The Owner holds separate contracts with several trade contractors (e.g., mechanical, electrical, structural).

    There is no General Contractor (GC).

    Each contractor is a prime directly reporting to the owner.

    The owner (or an assigned CM or architect) often takes on coordination and scheduling responsibilities.

    In traditional DBB:

    The Owner → hires Architect → prepares full design → bids to one General Contractor → GC subcontracts trades.

    In DBB with Multiple Primes:

    Instead of hiring one GC, the Owner directly hires several trade contractors — essentially splitting the general contract into multiple scopes.

    Higher risk for the owner due to increased coordination responsibilities.

    Cost savings possible by avoiding GC markups, but...

    Owner assumes schedule management, conflicts, and liability issues between trades.

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Emilynlsn3

    The Michael Hanahan - Schiff Hardin Lectures on Youtube help explain both of these!

    6
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk