Architectural fee problem
An architecture firm is awarded a project for an addition to an elementary school. Project details follow:
- Negotiated fee percentage: 5%
- Construction budget: $5,000,000
- Gross fee profit: 10%
- Consultant expenses: 35%
The firm now wants to manage the available architectural fee with the hours required to complete the project.
What is the available architectural fee?
A. | $137,500 |
B. | $146,250 |
C. | $162,500 |
D. | $187,500 |
CORRECT RESPONSE : A
$137,500
CALCULATIONS
1. $5,000,000 (construction budget) x 0.05 (negotiated fee percentage) = $250,000 (negotiated fee)
2. 0.35 (consultant expenses percentage) x $250,000 (negotiated fee) = $87,500 (consultant expenses)
3. $250,000 (negotiated fee) - $87,500 (consultant expenses) = $162,500
4. 0.10 (gross fee profit percentage) x $250,000 (negotiated fee) = $25,000 (target profit)
5. $162,500 - $25,000 = $137,500 (available architectural fee)
I am wondering why they have substracted gross fee profit from the negotiated fees?
I believe, we always include profit in our Architectural Fee !!
-
I guess the intent of the question is:
What is the fee available to complete the architectural design?
Gang Chen, Author, AIA, LEED AP BD+C (GreenExamEducation.com)
-
An architect’s fee proposal always includes profit and sub-consultants’ fees, plus a cause for reimbursable expenses.
Gang Chen, Author, AIA, LEED AP BD+C (GreenExamEducation.com)
-
Yes
Gang Chen, Author, AIA, LEED AP BD+C (GreenExamEducation.com)
-
Same here - got this wrong as well. Thought that profit was included in the architecture fee (isn't that the point of the net multiplier / direct salary expense multiplier?). Why would you ever separate it out? Very strange wording... had this issue with a number of the questions on the practice exam... very vague wording.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
8 comments