Comments

4 comments

  • Avatar
    David Kaplan

    Let me answer this this way to avoid a back and forth on the forum about how different jurisdictions approach this in real life practice: for the purposes of the ARE, if you're asked to do this on the exam, the test will tell you if you should round up or not, and if so, to how many decimal places.

    Period.  You don't need to know anything else other than that.

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Nicholas Hubof

    In my local jurisdictions (Washington and Idaho) we always round up!

    The theory behind that, is that you can't have a fraction of a human being. 3.1 occupants, would be rounded up to 4 occupants. 

    Good luck!

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    AlyssaBaz

    I've heard that it depends on what you're calculating: If it's the allowed occupants for a space such that will be posted in an Assembly area, it is not rounded up, but down to the nearest whole integer. If it's for the egress fire and life safety plan and has to do with the number of people collected in an exit access for example, then decimals are fine for calculating widths of corridors, required numbers of exits, etc. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Beau Tanner

    I know that I'm a little late to this conversation, but refer to IBC Section 1004.5: "For areas without fixed seating, the occupant load shall be not less than that number..."  In other words, round up for occupant load.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk