Is this another wrong question (example 14.2) from Ballast 5.0 Review Manual..?



  • Avatar
    Stephen Starks


    in my opinion...

    IBC section 506.3.2 seems to say that the value of "W" is 20 (as long as the actual distance is greater than or equal to 20 feet, but less than 30 feet). Remember, distances of over 30 ft. are handled in this way.

    If that is the case, Ballast's answer of 0.3 (0.33) would be accurate.

    However, according to the IBC 2015 code commentary this interpretation is inaccurate. The value of W is 24 feet based on the weighted average method found in section 506.3.2. Therefore, (((180 ft /240 ft) - 0.25)* 24 ft.) / 30 = 0.4 or answer D.

    Ballast's interpretation of code would seem to be inaccurate in this case (although you could make the argument to some code officials that this interpretation is acceptable - and win).

    As always though, check up on this yourself.

    Good catch!


    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Elif Bayram

    Hi Stephen! My understanding was same as yours, thanks for elaborating much better than I did.


    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Jose Cardona

    I came across this question and also got 0.4. The way that Ballast describes “W” is “the width of the public way or open space, which must be at least 20 ft; W may not be taken as greater than 30 ft, even if the actual width is greater.”

    Based on this, it means that W is greater than, or equal to, 20 ft and less than it equal to 30 ft. That said, the equation should have W at 24 feet; giving you an area factor increase of 0.4 (40%).

    I take the PPD exam in a few days so I guess I’ll see what happens haha.

    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk