Design Build Risk
The question below asks what are the problems and risks for the architect in the scenario. Without the mention of bridging, I assume this is a joint venture. Hence the contractor bears the risk of GMP, wouldn't the architect bear the same risk? Isn't having an adequate staff for the job a prerequisite for accepting the work? I don't see how relevant that is compared to GMP, can someone please explain? Thank you!
-
I don't believe this is a joint venture (as in the architect needs another architect to work alongside them to manage the project, for whatever reason), but more a standard contractual agreement between architect and GC (where only one of which is working for the owner). But, for your questions:
1. Working with the GMP is not a risk to the architect: the GC bears the responsibility if the project cost goes over that GMP threshold they provide to the owner. (Procore article on GMP: https://www.procore.com/library/construction-project-delivery-methods#2-design-build-db)
2. The architect has worked alongside the GC and owner on more traditional D-B-B projects, but has not on a D-B project. Entering into a new delivery method that is fast-tracked and quicker paced to churn out more buildings sooner leaves staffing as a potential risk if they are unable to handle the increased workload in a shorter time frame. They will also have to work with the GC and subs to ensure the design is properly conveyed through drawings and communicated accurately in all additional documentation.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
2 comments