ARE Demonstration Exam - Correct Responses

Follow

Comments

38 comments

  • Avatar
    Kati Susan Woodling

    Hi, NCARB! When can we expect to receive explanations for the answers provided above?

    I'm particularly interested in an explanation for this answer:

    Which one of the following strategies allows the architect to absorb the document production delay and minimize the risk of additional costs?

    • Ask the contractor to perform a constructability review prior to completion of the design development phase.
    • Direct the design team to produce multiple prime bid construction documents.
    • Add staff or direct existing staff to work overtime during the design development phase.

    According to AHPP, under the heading "Internal Practices: The Workplace," the text reads:

    Avoid overtime: Well-managed firms will strive to schedule deadlines to align with staff resources. Respect evening and weekend time for respite and not for additional shifts for salaried employees.

    There are several other references in the AHPP to working overtime that shed a negative light on it or encourage additional compensation, which would not keep the cost of the project down. Please advise.

    4
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Samuel Guenin

    Andrea,

    It gives you these reductions:

    1. Each Concessions/Retail space must be reduced by 10%.
    2. The seating capacity of the Main Event Space will decrease to 4,000, reducing the square footage by 15%.
    3. The building efficiency factor will decrease to 1.4.

    Calculating these 1-by-1:

    1. Each concession/retail space is 500 SF, and there are 4 of them. A 10% reduction in all 4 spaces will result in a reduction of 200 SF.  500 sf * 0.10 = 50 sf.   50 sf * 4 spaces = 200 sf
    2. The main event space has an overall size of 40,000 SF with the originally proposed 5,000 seats. A 15% reduction would result in a reduction of 6,000 SF.   40,000 sf * 0.15 = 6,000 sf
    3. This calculation is done at the end.

    To combine all of these reductions, you will first reduce the Net Square Footage by the calculations done above.   72,350 - 200 - 6,000 = 66,150 NSF. This is your new Net Square Footage. To achieve the new Gross Square Footage, you multiply by the new efficiency factor provided in the 3rd reduction above, 1.4.   66,150 NSF * 1.4 = 92,610 GSF.

    Hopefully this helped!

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Michael Shapiro

    Youstina and Daniel, I believe the emphasis is current pace.

    If 80% of the CD phase so far took 800 hours, then with that current pace, 100% would be 1000 hours. 

    260 (SD) + 700 (DD) + 1000 (CD) = 1960 hours spent to date after completion of CD phase at the current pace.

    2380 (total hours budgeted) - 1960 (hours spent to date) = 420 hours remaining

    That's how I solved it. I'm guessing that's what NCARB had in mind. Good luck to us all!

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    NCARB

    Hey Michael,

    I can help with this! Per the question, the client does not want to change the program, so the building needs to become more efficient (same NSF, lower GSF). By reducing GSF, the overall cost of the project will be reduced by $500/SF. 

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Andrea Vergara

    Do you know where I can find the process of Answer 2 from Case Study 1 of the Mock Exam? I am having a very hard time understanding how you got to:

    • 92,610 gross square feet

    Thank you!

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Youstina Youssef

    Hi,

    For Case study #2 question below, I'm trying to get to the 420 hours answered but however I solve it I get 430 hours. 

    At the current pace of work, how many project hours will remain after completion of construction documents?"

    • 420 hours

     

    Answer approach:

    Remaining CD work 20% x 952 budgeted hours = 190.4 hours needed for 100% CD

    Hours over/ under for CD = 152 hours remaining at 80% CD - 190.4 hours = -38.4 hours

    Hours remaining after CD = (-22 hrs SD)+(-105 hrs DD)+(-38.4 hrs CD)+119 hrs Bid + 476 hrs CA = 429.6 hours

       

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Elizabeth Hagberg

    @Rubi, thank you very much for helping me with this.  I just realized that a good deal of my confusion was assuming that this problem was using the equation:  

    Building Efficiency = Net Assignable Area/ Building Gross Area

    I am still not clear why the fraction is flipped, but at least I now understand the math.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Jessica Crouch

    @NCARB, thank you! I think this must've been a simple mistype in my calculations. Seems pretty straight forward. Thank you for clarifying!

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Daniel Magharious

    Case study #2, I get 430 hours as well.

    Rational is :

    - If he/she's at 80%, it means that at the current pace he/she's 4% over, which means 38 hours over.

    - Total of hours over are: 38 + 105 + 22 = 165.

    - Hours remaining at current pace: Remaining phases (595) - Total of hours over (165) = 430 hours.

    Please let us know what's NCARB Rational. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Elsiana Zhaka

    I am a bit confused.  Is there a reason to not provide a list of correct and incorrect questions at the end of the demo exam so that we have an idea of how we performed?  

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Mu-Yen Lee

    Daniel Magharious & Youstina Youssef, regarding to case study #2, please see below:

    I think we need to ignore whatever says on there for "%over/under", as the question stated CD are 80% complete, and the 80% took 800 hrs to complete.

    Thus, if 800 hrs represent 80%, then 100% would then requires total of 1000 hrs to complete (800/0.8, or use cross multiply) --> this step helps to calculate how much total hour is needed to complete CD phase with its current pace

    Use the originally allotted hours 2380 hrs to deduct what was already spent and use 1000 hrs for completion of CD phase: 2380 - 260 - 700 - 1000 = 420 hrs

    hope it helps!

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Andrea Vergara

    Thank you Samuel, much appreciated!

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Han Jin (Edited )

    Hi! Any chance of posting the answers to all the other case study questions that are not listed here? I remember there was a couple fill-in-the circle, which programs have to be on the ground floor, and point-to-location-on-siteplan type of questions on the demo exam that i would love to know the correct answers of. Thanks! @...

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Rubi Xu (Edited )

    @Elizabeth Hagberg

    none net area that need to be reduced to meet the budget

    2million / 500(unit price ) =4000 sqft

    use Programmed building area - 72,350 NSF / 108,525 GSF, client doesn't want to change program area so net stay the same

    new GSF(108525GSF-4000reduction)/72,350 NSF=1.4

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    NCARB

    Hi Ronald,

    Check out this post for more information on the item - https://are5community.ncarb.org/hc/en-us/community/posts/360052429113-Building-efficiency-factor

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Patrick Smith

    Why is the answer for the case study parking spaces 1,250?  A previous question specified that the event space would be reduced to 4,000 seats.  My answer was 1,000 spaces at 1 space per 4 seats per the zoning ordinance.  Do the case study questions not build off of the previous questions?  Or are we to treat every CS question individually?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    NCARB

    Patrick,

    Case study questions do not build on each other, so evaluate and answer each question independently of other questions. 

    Alvaro,

    The answer to the first question is 1.4.

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Joseph Hackett

    Hi, NCARB!

    For PjM Section 1 Question 1 - Architect is responding to an RFP, (1/4) item shown as correct does not make sense.  Why would the Architect be liable for control means and methods
    of construction?  That is strictly under the helm of the Contractor, i.e. Means & Methods of Construction. Correct?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Christine Mann

    Case study 1: question about which spaces must be on "ground" floor.

    Which program spaces must be located on the
    ground floor? Check the three that apply.

    So confusing that they appear to differentiate "ground" floor from "1st floor" when here in the US, they are 1 in the same. The spaces they put on the "first" floor are the wrong answers.

    RATIONALE: The Program Elements resource includes
    a list of required spaces, spatial characteristics, and
    adjacency requirements.

    According to the resource,
    Loading/Staging requires direct access to the Main Event
    Space and General Building Storage, making the ground
    floor the most appropriate location for these spaces.

    Placing the Athletic Locker Rooms on the ground floor
    fulfills the programs requirement of allowing athletes
    easy access to the athletic court.

    The Main Entry and
    Hospitality Room require a connection to the Main
    Concourse, making the first floor the appropriate
    location for both spaces.

    Guest Services/Information
    should be located adjacent to the Main Entry per the
    program requirements.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Alvaro Briganti

    What is the answer to the first question?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Mu-Yen Lee (Edited )

    Rubi Xu do you know if this question falls under PjM or other subject? thank you!

     

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Rubi Xu

    @Mu-Yen Lee it is for PA i think, casestudy #1

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Charles Lent (Edited )

    Out of curiosity would most of these questions in case study #2 fall in the PCM or PJM category of exam questions? Thank you

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    NCARB

    Hey Han,

    Check out pages 148-154 of the ARE 5.0 Handbook. You will find the answers to the other case study questions on these pages. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Jennifer Watts

    Hello... THis is for the Case Study, where the S.F. was reduced to 4,000 :  I was thinking of it differently so wanted to ask. @ 40,000 n.s.f., and 5,000 seats, would mean the max area per occupant is 8 net. If the seats are now 4,000, I was thinking the new nsf would be 4,000 * 8 , making it 32,000 s.f (opposed to the 40,000 x .15, = 6000, making it 34,000). I got 89810 s.f. However - I dont see anywhere in the chart of using 8 as an occupant load. Just curious how the Occupant load is factored into these calculations. Thank you! 

    • Each Concessions/Retail space must be reduced by 10%.
    • The seating capacity of the Main Event Space will decrease to 4,000, reducing the square footage by 15%.
    • The building efficiency factor will decrease to 1.4.

    Additionally, the area of the Exterior Plaza will be capped at 4,000 square feet.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ronald Martin

    In Case study #1, Question regarding Building Efficiency factor.

    Why are the building efficiency factors in the possible answers all greater than 1? My understanding is Building efficiency is net floor area or rentable floor area/ Total gross floor area. The net floor area or rentable floor area will never be greater than the gross floor area, therefore never over 1.

    NCARB Can you please help clarify??

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Beatriz Eugenia Lopez

    Hi, Joseph,

    The question reads Architect is responding to an RFP for an architect-led design-build...

    I think this is why part of the answer includes schedule and control means and methods of construction.
    When I was studying for PjM I read lots of content from the AHPP. Section 9.5 has more information in this subject.

    I hope this helps.
    Beatriz

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    NCARB

    Hi Blecille,

    Here is a link to the ARE Handbook. Also, the link in the above post has been updated. Thanks for the heads up!

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Elizabeth Hagberg

    Can someone please explain how we get 1.4 for the first question in Case Study #1?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Elizabeth Hagberg

    Rubi, I am a little brain dead right now - been studying and working a lot.  I have read and re-read and it still does not make sense to me.  Can you explain?  

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Powered by Zendesk